Quick question. Double 6 strike, can it be eliminated?
Thu 29 Jun 2017, 20:10
mmoi1300 | Quick question. Double 6 strike, can it be eliminated? | Lead | [-] | |
Posts: 8 26/04/15 18:48 | I have one quick question: is it possible for the power of the 6 strike to be eliminated when you have a 6 strike turning into a 6 strike, or does it mean that the 6 strike is permanent no matter what? I got this:
The self line turns into an element which bounds back at itself, so it makes me think that the 6 strike could be eliminated. But it's a 6 strike turning into a 6 strike, so I'm wondering if it can still be eliminated. | |||
Interact | Reply Quote | |||
mmoi1300 | #1 | [-] | ||
Posts: 8 26/04/15 18:55 | I just found this: http://www.superiching.com/hexkillback.htm This doesn't look good at all. Frightening stuff. Seems like a very bad luck indicator. Edit: Is it at all possible that I've got the sides of the coins switched around? Meaning that what I have here isn't actually Shun/57 turning into Chen/1, but instead it's actually Zen/51 turning into Quen/2? I used British 10 pence coins, such that three queen's faces would be X, two queen's faces would be -, one queen's face would be --, etc. http://coinquest.com/cgi-data/cq_ro/response_380/great_britain_10_new_pence_1987.jpg This sort of coin. Edited 1 time by mmoi1300 26/04/15 19:55. | |||
Interact | Reply Quote | |||
Xiao Hu | #2 | [-] | ||
Posts: 830 26/04/15 20:15 | mmoi1300 wrote:Does it say anywhere in book double 6 strike have a dif set of rules when it comes to eliminating 6 strike ?? if not than law is same. I'm not saying everything Alex wrote in book is correct, but if there was an exception to law he would have mentioned that. Now, 6 strike is a centrifugal force pushing all the lines away from each other. it generally means "no", of whatever question you have in mind. But sometime, depending on the topic, can indicate the necessity to act soon, before certain conditions will be no more available, as the time pass. Oh in case you didn't notice, lower & upper trigrams in your hex bounds back = restrictions. So, for example if you asked about your career this can mean restrictions for career advancement, or if you asked about someone else than it means restrictions for both side etc etc.. | |||
Interact | Reply Quote | |||
Xiao Hu | #3 | [-] | ||
Posts: 830 26/04/15 20:42 | hehe this remind me of some1 i used to know who had same confusion with sides of real IC coins. You see, Chinese didn't use British coins for tossing, there is no question here of following tradition or not. In my opinion, it doesn't really matter which side you pick for yin/yang as long as you stick with it. | |||
Interact | Reply Quote | |||
wwfjdraw | #4 | [-] | ||
Posts: 124 13/06/15 23:18 | Xiao Hu, your the most skilled I have ever seen in this forum, regarding I-Ching. Will you take the Randi million dollar challenge? And show an accuracy rate higher than random odds of probability? Then you could win the money. | |||
Interact | Reply Quote | |||
Xiao Hu | #5 | [-] | ||
Posts: 830 14/06/15 00:12 | what are you talking about ??? if i seem most skilled to you is simply cause no one else is around. fortunately for me when i started to learn forum was active with many good readers. I have a good base, but I'm struggling with I-C myself. | |||
Interact | Reply Quote | |||
wwfjdraw | #6 | [-] | ||
Posts: 124 14/06/15 16:09 | I just think the book needs to be summarized. When I am done the book will only be a couple hundred pages, and it will not show many hexagram examples, instead only show the laws and the charts and exist as a system where with every single reading, the tosser simply gets a highlighter and highlights the laws, then after going throughout the entire summarized book, can then put it all together with the highlighted sections. | |||
Interact | Reply Quote | |||
wwfjdraw | #7 | [-] | ||
Posts: 124 14/06/15 16:20 | To go through AC book or site and look up all that information every time someone has a reading is outrageous. No one can memorize the entire system unless they are willing to spend more time learning it then actually living the very lives they are predicting. Another problem is that there are certain examples where AC says that he would just retoss, or that are dead certainty in answers, well this section needs to be the very first section of the process to getting an answer, because if someone gets a certain sign that is either certain of something or is valid of a retoss then so be it before going any further. For example in the book online AC mentions somewhere that tossing on day II is the most difficult in adding confusion, so then how about a rule at the beginning of the book, telling people not to toss on day II, unless they want to add more work in the reading process? Next should be identification. There is no point in telling someone to read anything at all period ever if you have first not explained how to identify who is who, and the colors help do that. And it seems like AC never gives a reading process, like when using the book to look up laws and how those laws affect the reading, he never tells you how to do it in steps. He gives out steps on how to toss, don't get me wrong on that note, but does not have his book in a step by step process on how to read, instead he jumbles it confusingly together. PS has anyone even seen AC lately? And can someone help me with the topic I replied to that is over a year old Please and Thank you, for any help. |
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum